2 User(s) làđọc chủ đề này 30 phút vừa qua
0Thành viên2 Khách
0Thành viên2 Khách
What's popular right now:
1.6 reward campaing (43 users)
AoKTS updates (40 users)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (34 users)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (22 users)
Word Association (19 users)
Setting up port forwarding in ro... (13 users)
Realms for Age of Empires II: Th... (13 users)
Most active threads in past week:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (45 posts)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 posts)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (7 posts)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (7 posts)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (6 posts)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 posts)
Who vs? challenge to Boobly 2v2 (3 posts)
1) Group stage qualifiers > A series of FFA games
2) 2v2
My opinion.
I do wonder about teaming :/ There used to be a time where players wouldn't conspire against another player because said player was known to be good etc.
My opinion.
In that game you talk about, it was the one I paused because I had an emergency and I was winning, and you decided unpause, to take advantage of it, and another player in the game started to block the routes, do not make excuses, and say things as they are, do not become the victim.
1) Group stage qualifiers > A series of FFA games
2) 2v2
Regarding 2v2 you can try, but with clear rules about blocking with purpose, and exchanging positions, maybe 2 games and the one that accumulates more gold wins ..
Since the ttf games are really long.
In that game you talk about, it was the one I paused because I had an emergency and I was winning, and you decided unpause, to take advantage of it, and another player in the game started to block the routes, do not make excuses, and say things as they are, do not become the victim.
I have rec, and proof that it was like that, so stop inventing, please.
Do not try to interfere with your opinions without base, what they do is that less people are interested in this.